Prototyping & Fabrication Services

Cea-LETI

Technologies

CEA-Leti’s LUMIK optomechanical sensor technology represents the next evolution of microelectromechanical (MEMS) sensors. From the capacitive sensors of the 1980s to the more recent piezoresistive sensors, MEMS have become increasingly sensitive over the past several decades. Today, CEA-Leti is bringing silicon photonics to high-performance MEMS for a new generation of optomechanical sensors. 

LUMIK is a technology combining silicon photonics and MEMS components in silicon-on-insulator substrates. Selective doping and metallic contacts allow electrical actuation and highly-performant opto-mechanical detection.

 

Key Features
  • Advanced MEMS sensors – combining high-performance and speed thanks to optomechanical detection
  • Si-based technology combining MEMS and silicon photonics process steps, 200 mm wafer size
  • Standard cells including optical components (grating couplers, waveguides, resonators) – little to no knowledge of photonics is required
  • 1 silicon level, critical dimension of 80 nm (gaps and lines)
  • Telecom wavelengths (~1550 nm), optical and electrical interconnections
Technology details
CEA-Leti LUMIK
Technology characteristics
Silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate
Wafer size: 200mm (725µm thick)
Top silicon layer:
• Resistivity: 8.5-11-5 .cm
• Crystal orientation: <100>
• Doping type: P/Boron
Buried oxide thickness: 1µm
Definition of grating couplers using DUV lithography followed by partial Si dry etching (depth of 70nm).
Definition of photonic and mechanical components using e-beam lithography and Si dry etching (220 nm).
Definition of electrodes via localized p-doping in Si (5×1019 at/cm³) combined with one metal level: AlSi electrical lines.
Structures’ release by HF etching
Die dicing by stealth dicing
Design area – multiples of 4 x 4 mm²
Special features
Optomechanical process: combining mechanical, electrical and photonic components
Optimized for 1550 nm telecom wavelengths
Optical interconnections through grating couplers
Electrical interconnections / pads with AlSi contacts
Application areas
MEMS (electromechanical) sensors with extreme sensitivity and bandwidth / speed
Example application areas:
• Biological sensing
• Silicon clocks
• Mass spectrometry
• Particle sensing
• Inertial
Turnaround time
Around 10 months for manufacturing
1 additional month for dicing and bare dies delivery

CEA-Leti’s optomechanical resonators have already surpassed MEMS in several sensing applications, enabling breakthroughs such as video-rate atomic force microscopy, ultra-sensitive mass detection of non-spherical particles, GHz MEMS clocks and GHz Brownian motion detection in liquids.

 

[1] F.-R. Lamberti et al., “Real-Time Sensing with Multiplexed Optomechanical Resonators,” Nano Lett., Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04017.

[2] M. Sansa et al., “Optomechanical mass spectrometry,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17592-9.

[3] T. Furcatte et al., “Optimizing Optomechanical Resonators for Ultra-High-Frequency Timing Applications,” in 2024 Symposium on Design, Test, Integration and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS (DTIP), Jun. 2024, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/DTIP62575.2024.10613067.

[4] T. Furcatte et al., “Towards GHz low phase noise oscillators with electro-optomechanical resonators,” in 2024 IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Joint Symposium (UFFC-JS), Sep. 2024, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/UFFC-JS60046.2024.10793753.

[5] A. Marković et al., “Suspended tip overhanging from chip edge for atomic force microscopy with an optomechanical resonator,” JOM, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 033501, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1117/1.JOM.4.3.033501.

[6] L. Schwab et al., “Very-high-frequency probes for atomic force microscopy with silicon optomechanics,” Microsyst Nanoeng, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41378-022-00364-4.

[7] P. Etienne Allain et al., “Optomechanical resonating probe for very high frequency sensing of atomic forces,” Nanoscale, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 2939–2945, 2020, doi: 10.1039/C9NR09690F.

[8] H. E. Dawale, L. Sibeud, S. Regord, G. Jourdan, S. Hentz, and F. Badets, “Compact Modeling and Behavioral Simulation of an Optomechanical Sensor in Verilog A,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 4677–4681, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TED.2020.3024477.

[9] H. E. Dawale, G. Jourdan, L. Sibeud, F. Lamberti, S. Hentz, and F. Badets, “Analytical Compact Model for Opto-Mechanical Sensor,” in 2020 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Jan. 2020, pp. 869–872. doi: 10.1109/MEMS46641.2020.9056258.

[10] L. Schwab et al., “Comprehensive optical losses investigation of VLSI Silicon optomechanical ring resonator sensors,” presented at the Technical Digest – International Electron Devices Meeting, IEDM, 2019, p. 4.7.1-4.7.4. doi: 10.1109/IEDM.2018.8614508.

[11] M. Hermouet et al., “Very Large Scale Integration Optomechanics: a cure for loneliness of NEMS resonators?,” in 2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Dec. 2018, p. 12.4.1-12.4.3. doi: 10.1109/IEDM.2018.8614532.

[12] M. Hermouet et al., “Ultra sensitive optomechanical microdisk resonators with very large scale integration process,” in 2018 IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Jan. 2018, pp. 844–845. doi: 10.1109/MEMSYS.2018.8346687.

[13] M. Hermouet et al., “1 million-Q optomechanical microdisk resonators for sensing with very large scale integration,” presented at the Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging – Proceedings of SPIE, 2018. doi: 10.1117/12.2290322.

Schematic cross-section of the technology
Typical components of an optomechanical MEMS sensor and implementation examples